One of the
most important lessons of my lifetime is one that I'm very thankful
that I've learned well--that of taking small steps, and even more
importantly, being satisfied with those small steps. I've
always tended to want things done now, or even five minutes ago, but
life has been very good at teaching me that not only is that not
always possible, but it's usually not even desirable.
I've always
been the kind of person who would take a painting class and want to
paint a masterpiece on my first outing. I'd start to build a
bookcase and want it all done in an hour, and I'd want it to be
perfect. I'd start a school program and want my degree in a
matter of months, but I'd be told that it would take years.
Don't
worry--I'm not the kind of person who would rant and rail about
things being "too slow"--all of my discontent was inside
of me, more in the way I felt than the way I acted. One of the
problems that contributed to this bigger problem is the fact that
I'm usually pretty good at whatever I do--I learn very quickly, and
I'm almost always able to work at an accelerated pace, so slowness
frustrates me a lot. But I do realize that not everyone learns
at the same pace; many people need things to go more slowly, so
it's important that I be patient and understand that things won't
always go at my pace.
I notice that my students tend to have a hard time with this. They also want things done now, and to move on to the next thing. I often have them write just one paragraph of a paper at a time, and they're usually pretty astonished to see how well developed their finished essay is because they gave attention to the individual parts instead of trying to write an entire essay at one sitting.
I've
seen this ability reflected in the work that goes with writing novels--inside, I often feel impatient when the
novel isn't done as soon as I start chapter one, but the
process is obviously much more involved than that. You don't write novels as a whole or even chapter by chapter--you write them sentence by sentence, and often word by word.
Cooking
is another activity that allows one to focus on the process instead
of an immediate finished product. Even something as simple as
making a salad forces one to work first with the lettuce, then with
the tomatoes, then with the cucumbers. . . . It can't be done
immediately. Unfortunately, though, we live in the age of
meals in a box, and people don't have to learn the process any
more--they just have to boil some water or throw things into the
microwave.
Is
it any wonder, then, that we have a hard time honoring the processes
of life, and allowing ourselves to flow with them at the speed they
take naturally? We're so used to getting everything done at
once that we don't have time to take the small steps and actually
enjoy them for what they are--pieces in a larger process that leads
to a finished product in which we can take pride.
The
ability to be satisfied with small steps is a reflection of my
growth in letting go of control of situations over which I have no
control, especially as far as time is concerned. I don't see
doing something slowly as a reflection on me any longer, and I don't
see not being finished as a negative, no matter how someone else may
look at it. I can't tell you how many times people have asked
"You're not finished yet?" when I've been taking my time
through a process so that the finished product is as good as I know
it can be. If I can take an extra day or two on something and
know that its quality will be immensely greater, then I will take
the extra time; I haven't always been this way.
There's something very liberating about finishing a chapter and not thinking, "Only twenty more to go!" It's a good feeling to recognize the accomplishment of having written the chapter and knowing that it was an important task that soon will contribute to a book as a whole
Life
is a process, and we must honor it. All of our years don't
come at once, so we must learn and grow as the lessons come to us,
and we must let them change us at their pace, and not try to force
things to happen. If we can do this, we'll find the peace that
the gardener feels knowing that the vegetables won't be ready for
harvest for months, and the peace that the rancher or farmer feels
when new calves are born and they must grow and develop before
they're a productive part of the ranch or farm. It's the peace
that comes from doing what we can do when we can do it, and leaving
the rest for the right time to do the rest.
Thoughts and ideas on what goes into living our lives fully and happily. There are no set answers here, just some observations of life and living that hopefully can help you to see things in a positive light!
30 March 2017
25 March 2017
No recognition needed
Quite a while ago, I took the first steps that I needed
to take in order to let go of the need for
recognition. I have no idea what those steps were, nor
do I remember what I did to take them, but I know that there
came a point in my life at which I was much less interested
in getting recognition than I was in getting done whatever
job needed to be done. I no longer needed the
validation of recognition nearly as much as I had needed it before.
Don't get me wrong--I still like and appreciate recognition, especially when I've done a good job on something important. But I've found that there's a great difference between needing recognition and appreciating it, and most of that difference has to do with my expectations.
When I do a good job, I know it--and that should be enough. The satisfaction that comes from doing a job well should make me feel good enough about myself and my work that I don't need any outside praise to make me feel better. When I don't keep this thought in mind, though, or when I'm in one of my needier moods, I sometimes feel the need (though it's more a desire than a need, of course) for someone else's praise in order to validate my work.
What happens then? Well, when I show my work to someone else, I all of a sudden have expectations concerning the way I think they should act--I expect them to praise the work, and either directly or indirectly praise me for having done it. Once I have expectations like this, I'm opening myself up to being very disappointed when they don't respond as I expect them to.
I also find that not expecting the "glory" has another positive effect--it allows other people to take praise and benefit from what's been done without me having to take a share of it. Now I'm not one who believes that praise should be handed out freely for even mediocre work, nor am I one who believes that one person should get credit for the work of several, but there's something very gratifying in allowing others to stand in the spotlight when they've done a good job.
As teachers, we get pretty used to this--when students excel or graduate, it's a great moment for them, and it's great to see them receive the praise that they deserve. As teachers, though, it would be very easy for us to say "Well just a minute--this student might have just graduated, but who do you think taught him? What about the work that we've put in to helping him develop the skills and knowledge that were necessary for him to get this far?" And for all practical purposes, that's a valid point.
On the job, there are many managers who do such a good job of mentoring and training the people they supervise that those people accomplish great things at work. Very often, the manager him- or herself gets little to no credit for the success of others, though. The problem on the workplace, though, is that too many managers see their main responsibility as getting the job done, and they don't make the effort to help the workers to grow and learn.
Parents spend a couple of decades helping their children to grow and develop, and their job doesn't end when their children leave home. It's always heartwarming and gratifying, though, to see young people thank their parents for their love and support when those young people are recognized for their achievements in life. Parents, too, could make the argument that without them and their influence, their children wouldn't be able to achieve the things they've accomplished.
But what purpose would it serve to make the point? Really, it would serve no purpose at all except to diminish the achievement of the young person--and that's why we almost never hear this point being made. A parent's responsibility is to help the young person to grow and develop. The job of a manager or supervisor is to help the people who work for them to grow and develop (as well as to get the job done). Our job as teachers is to empower students to grow and develop. We're simply doing our job if we accomplish this.
I remind myself constantly that I don't need recognition to validate myself as a person, but even with the constant reminders I still find myself wanting to hear the praise of others for my work. There's nothing wrong with that, of course, but my hope is that I can continue to wean myself from this need as time goes on so that my personal happiness and satisfaction no longer rest ever again on the actions or responses of other people. All I can do is keep trying, and try I shall.
Don't get me wrong--I still like and appreciate recognition, especially when I've done a good job on something important. But I've found that there's a great difference between needing recognition and appreciating it, and most of that difference has to do with my expectations.
When I do a good job, I know it--and that should be enough. The satisfaction that comes from doing a job well should make me feel good enough about myself and my work that I don't need any outside praise to make me feel better. When I don't keep this thought in mind, though, or when I'm in one of my needier moods, I sometimes feel the need (though it's more a desire than a need, of course) for someone else's praise in order to validate my work.
What happens then? Well, when I show my work to someone else, I all of a sudden have expectations concerning the way I think they should act--I expect them to praise the work, and either directly or indirectly praise me for having done it. Once I have expectations like this, I'm opening myself up to being very disappointed when they don't respond as I expect them to.
I also find that not expecting the "glory" has another positive effect--it allows other people to take praise and benefit from what's been done without me having to take a share of it. Now I'm not one who believes that praise should be handed out freely for even mediocre work, nor am I one who believes that one person should get credit for the work of several, but there's something very gratifying in allowing others to stand in the spotlight when they've done a good job.
As teachers, we get pretty used to this--when students excel or graduate, it's a great moment for them, and it's great to see them receive the praise that they deserve. As teachers, though, it would be very easy for us to say "Well just a minute--this student might have just graduated, but who do you think taught him? What about the work that we've put in to helping him develop the skills and knowledge that were necessary for him to get this far?" And for all practical purposes, that's a valid point.
On the job, there are many managers who do such a good job of mentoring and training the people they supervise that those people accomplish great things at work. Very often, the manager him- or herself gets little to no credit for the success of others, though. The problem on the workplace, though, is that too many managers see their main responsibility as getting the job done, and they don't make the effort to help the workers to grow and learn.
Parents spend a couple of decades helping their children to grow and develop, and their job doesn't end when their children leave home. It's always heartwarming and gratifying, though, to see young people thank their parents for their love and support when those young people are recognized for their achievements in life. Parents, too, could make the argument that without them and their influence, their children wouldn't be able to achieve the things they've accomplished.
But what purpose would it serve to make the point? Really, it would serve no purpose at all except to diminish the achievement of the young person--and that's why we almost never hear this point being made. A parent's responsibility is to help the young person to grow and develop. The job of a manager or supervisor is to help the people who work for them to grow and develop (as well as to get the job done). Our job as teachers is to empower students to grow and develop. We're simply doing our job if we accomplish this.
I remind myself constantly that I don't need recognition to validate myself as a person, but even with the constant reminders I still find myself wanting to hear the praise of others for my work. There's nothing wrong with that, of course, but my hope is that I can continue to wean myself from this need as time goes on so that my personal happiness and satisfaction no longer rest ever again on the actions or responses of other people. All I can do is keep trying, and try I shall.
06 March 2017
Rejecting
I go through an annual bout with allergies--three or four weeks in the spring when pollen
causes my sinuses and nasal passages to do all sorts of
crazy things, mostly having to do with sneezing and creating
immense quantities of fluids with which I can fill tissue
after tissue. These are the days when I almost never
get a full night's sleep, for I wake up two or three times
either sneezing or so congested that I almost can't
breathe. The medicine that worked so well the first year
now works fairly well, as I think I've been building up an
immunity to it--I still wake up very often and end up
walking around like a zombie the next day.
When all is said and done, though, I'm pretty grateful that this is the extent of my poor health on an annual basis--when I think of all that I could be going through with a different health problem, my problems are very minor in comparison, and I have to be thankful to be afflicted with simply a reaction to pollen.
I've started to look at this affliction a bit differently, though, and I'm not sure why. I've been aware for years that my allergies are caused by my body trying to fend off an "intruder" that's completely harmless: pollen. My body is sneezing and watering and draining and itching because it wants to get rid of something that it doesn't need to get rid of. What a waste of energy and fluids that is!
I've tried to imagine what it would be like to get my body not to fight off the pollen--to just let it be when it enters my system. All of the symptoms then, in theory, would disappear, and I would no longer have allergic reactions. But that's only if I can accomplish allowing my body to accept the "intruder" and not try to fight it off. The allergy medications merely stop the call to battle by blocking the histamines, from my understanding--it's suppressing a reaction that's trying to happen, causing another battle inside of me, and it does get me pretty tired.
I've realized that this has been a trait of mine that goes far beyond pollen and allergies--I've always tried to push away anything that appears to be a threat, trying to keep myself "safe." It seems to be a rather normal human tendency, but I go a bit further because of some other things that have gone on in my life, and I know for a fact that I've rejected some things and people in my life that could have helped me to grow, to mature, and to learn--all because my first perception was that these things posed a threat to me.
My allergies mirror a very important aspect of who I've been for many years, and I'm pretty convinced that the only way I can get rid of my allergies is to get rid of this harmful aspect of myself. It's okay to want to protect myself, but I also reject the good and the harmless when I try too hard. That's what my body's doing--it's trying too hard to protect itself, and making me miserable because it's trying to reject some simple pollen.
These days, whenever the symptoms start up, I try to tell myself to relax and to let the pollen alone--there's no need to reject it. I'm trying hard to extend that approach to other things in life, also, that I perceive as a threat. So far, I don't see any big changes, but I'm pretty sure that the more at peace I get with the perceived threats in my life, the more at peace my allergies will be. Even if I don't succeed in lessening the severity of my allergies, at least I'll be working at something very important--acceptance of life and the different aspects of life.
Most of the things we face in life are as harmless as pollen, but we spend a lot of effort and go through a lot of agony trying to keep them away, anyway. I've realized by looking at my allergies in a new way that I want to be more open and more accepting, and that I don't want to spend so much time rejecting things in a futile effort to keep myself safe from something that I don't even need protection from.
When all is said and done, though, I'm pretty grateful that this is the extent of my poor health on an annual basis--when I think of all that I could be going through with a different health problem, my problems are very minor in comparison, and I have to be thankful to be afflicted with simply a reaction to pollen.
I've started to look at this affliction a bit differently, though, and I'm not sure why. I've been aware for years that my allergies are caused by my body trying to fend off an "intruder" that's completely harmless: pollen. My body is sneezing and watering and draining and itching because it wants to get rid of something that it doesn't need to get rid of. What a waste of energy and fluids that is!
I've tried to imagine what it would be like to get my body not to fight off the pollen--to just let it be when it enters my system. All of the symptoms then, in theory, would disappear, and I would no longer have allergic reactions. But that's only if I can accomplish allowing my body to accept the "intruder" and not try to fight it off. The allergy medications merely stop the call to battle by blocking the histamines, from my understanding--it's suppressing a reaction that's trying to happen, causing another battle inside of me, and it does get me pretty tired.
I've realized that this has been a trait of mine that goes far beyond pollen and allergies--I've always tried to push away anything that appears to be a threat, trying to keep myself "safe." It seems to be a rather normal human tendency, but I go a bit further because of some other things that have gone on in my life, and I know for a fact that I've rejected some things and people in my life that could have helped me to grow, to mature, and to learn--all because my first perception was that these things posed a threat to me.
My allergies mirror a very important aspect of who I've been for many years, and I'm pretty convinced that the only way I can get rid of my allergies is to get rid of this harmful aspect of myself. It's okay to want to protect myself, but I also reject the good and the harmless when I try too hard. That's what my body's doing--it's trying too hard to protect itself, and making me miserable because it's trying to reject some simple pollen.
These days, whenever the symptoms start up, I try to tell myself to relax and to let the pollen alone--there's no need to reject it. I'm trying hard to extend that approach to other things in life, also, that I perceive as a threat. So far, I don't see any big changes, but I'm pretty sure that the more at peace I get with the perceived threats in my life, the more at peace my allergies will be. Even if I don't succeed in lessening the severity of my allergies, at least I'll be working at something very important--acceptance of life and the different aspects of life.
Most of the things we face in life are as harmless as pollen, but we spend a lot of effort and go through a lot of agony trying to keep them away, anyway. I've realized by looking at my allergies in a new way that I want to be more open and more accepting, and that I don't want to spend so much time rejecting things in a futile effort to keep myself safe from something that I don't even need protection from.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)