I like the words "good" and "goodness."
They're simple words packed with meaning, and almost no two people
in the world would agree on just what they mean. Many people
even disagree whether people's actions are motivations are good in
their depths or if they're good on the surface. For example,
if a person gives a certain amount of money to a charity to avoid
allowing his or her spouse to get that money in a divorce
settlement, is the act a good act, or a selfish act? It may
be good that the charity gets the money, but many people want to
stop there and not think things through more thoroughly--is it
good that the charity gets money that the spouse might have needed
desperately, but is now denied?
In such a case, one person's good is another person's bad.
Do the two sides balance out?
I believe that for an act or motive to be good, it truly has to be
pure. In other words, if I do a kind act for a neighbor,
it's truly good only if I have absolutely no expectations of any
sort of reciprocal benefit. If I encourage someone, I have
no expectations of any sort of thank you or other sign of
gratitude. I do it simply because I know that it's good and
because I want to do good.
Because you see, if I do something "good" for you and
expect your gratitude or some sort of reward in return, then I'm
creating an obligation for you, one that you probably neither want
nor need. And if you don't fulfill that obligation, the
results can end up being anger, frustration, and resentment on
both of our parts--and how can such a result even remotely be
considered good? And if it ends up with such results, then
the "good" of the original action was simply an
illusion, not a truth.
So if I want to
be good--and I do, even if I'm not sure what it
means--I need to be aware of my motives and my
desired outcomes for any action that I take.
Am I doing this just because I want to do something
good? If so, there's a good chance that the
action I take is, in fact, good.
Being and doing good, I think, is mostly a matter of
heart, and much less a matter of mind. In our
hearts, we know when we're doing good and we know
when we're doing something to benefit ourselves, and
it's important to listen to our hearts when they
speak to us. If we do this, we can be much
more sure that what we're doing is, indeed,
good. I may help a neighbor with something to
make her feel obligated to send a plate of cookies
my way the next time she bakes, but my heart will
know that my motive is not pure. My heart will
know it if I'm helping just to help, with no attempt
to make her feel obligated.
And if a plate of cookies does appear without any
attempt to make her feel obligated, then there's
another good act in this world. If she sends
over the cookies because she knows I'm expecting
them for having helped her, then just how
"good" is her act?
There are, of course, acts that count as mutual
goods. Perhaps my co-worker is having a hard
time with a certain task, and it ends up being my
task at the end of the day. Teaching him or
her how to do the task and do it well is good for
that person and for me, as I'll no longer be
expected to take on that task, and I can focus on my
own work.
When we examine
our motives for doing the things we do, we start to
change as people. When we start to try to do
good for the sake of good and not for any potential
benefits, we start to become good people in our
core, at heart. When we start to be
good, then we start to do things for motives that
are much more pure, and we start to strengthen and
reinforce the good that is in us.
A good person doesn't need to have ulterior motives
for doing things--that person knows that when we do
good, we greatly improve the quality of our own
lives. When we're good to other people, we
strengthen the world and we strengthen ourselves,
and we give the others a bit more faith in the
goodness of life and humanity. Goodness helps
to destroy cynicism, and it helps others to see the
world more brightly. Being good helps us to
avoid many kinds of stress, the kind that comes from
fearing being caught doing something we shouldn't do
or saying something we shouldn't say.
I want to be
good, and I want to do good. It isn't always
easy, though, for there are almost always
conflicting motives in the way of doing good.
Yes, I can help this person, but there's a cost of
time. Yes, I can do that good thing, but it
will cost money. That's definitely a good
thing to do, but it's risky--I'll risk failure and
I'll risk being criticized. And saving time
and money, of course, are two of out stronger
desires as people, as is the avoidance of failure
and criticism. But the stakes are very
high--do I want to look back five years from now and
think of all the good I didn't do because of my
fear, or all the good I did do in spite of my
fear? To me, the answer to that question is
very obvious, and it's within my power--with every
decision that I make--to answer it with the
knowledge that I did, indeed, do every good I could.
Goodness
consists not in the outward things we do, but in
the inward thing we are. To be good is the great thing.
Edwin H. Chapin